Lou Bloom from <i>Nightcrawler </i>would’ve upped that 1/30 hit rate ten-fold

Não espere grandes atuações, mas quem gostou de Apocalipse Now e Full Metal Jacket vai enxergar semelhanças em Civil War, cujo medo e tensão são apresentados na visão dos fotojornalistas

I don't know if war journalists are really THAT close to the action but it was impressive to follow them around as stuff was going down. Quite a few impressive scenes with a realistic setting. I kinda wish we had more backstory on this civil war, although it's not really necessary. P.S.: This is my 3000th movie! I was trying to find something with the number '3000' in the title but I could only think of 'Three Thousand Years of Longing' and I didn't feel like watching that. I asked ChatGPT to find a connection between '3000' and Civil War but he could only give me Wikipedia pages, so now I just seem lazy and I could have done it myself but oh well: 1. 3000 (number): Start at the Wikipedia page for the number 3000. 2. Avengers: Endgame: On the page for the number 3000, you may find a mention of "Avengers: Endgame," where "I love you 3000" is an iconic line. 3. Joe Russo: From the "Avengers: Endgame" page, you can navigate to Joe Russo, one of the directors. 4. 21 Laps Entertainment: On Joe Russo's page, find a link to 21 Laps Entertainment, a production company he has worked with. 5. Alex Garland: From the 21 Laps Entertainment page, navigate to the page for Alex Garland, as his recent projects might be mentioned. 6. Civil War (2024 film): Finally, on Alex Garland's page, you can find information about his upcoming movie "Civil War."

Had to rewatch this since I’m out here following the military with my camera.

Es una buena película por su premisa interesante y sus imágenes fantásticas, pero siento que al final se quedó sin nafta e ideas mas allá de la premisa inicial.

Çok büyük t4ss4k gerektiren bir film olmuş.

last 20 mins were crazy but jessie MOVE omfg😒

finally some Nikon representation

Watched again today for ...reasons. Depressing. Beautifully filmed. I never saw the draw of Dunst until this movie. Pretti. Good.

muito massa ver os alunos empolgados assistindo esse, wagner moura tu é rei

The title “Civil War” may conjure mental images of combat galore, pulse-pounding action sequences, and glorious scenes of battle and valor. Alex Garland’s new film has some of these things, but your heart is less likely to be jolted by action than it is to be slowly cranked to a frantic pace by the unrelenting tension that is laid thick across the entire runtime. The majority of _Civil War_ is a road movie. Lee (Kirsten Dunst) is a war photojournalist who is traveling from New York City to Washington, D.C. with fellow journalists Sammy (Stephen McKinley Henderson) and Joel (Wagner Maura), along with a young upstart photographer, Jessie (Cailee Spaeny). Years into an American civil war, parts of the United States are desolate, dangerous places; of course, these are the parts that the group must pass through. Lee and Joel are intent on interviewing and photographing the President (Nick Offerman) before the conflict comes to what they believe is its inevitable end with his execution. With a pretty on-the-nose deadline of July 4, the clock starts clicking. Interestingly, this film shies away almost completely from political conversations surrounding the nuances of the larger conflict. The provocative title and concept evokes our national anxiety, particularly in a contentious election year, but then subverts what we expect from it in a fascinating way. We hear snippets of background, like a disbanded FBI and the “Antifa Massacre”, but generally speaking, it’s not about who did what to start the war — instead, it’s about the war already in progress, and how it has devastated the country. Rather than investigating the division between Republican and Democrat, Garland (ironically, a British filmmaker) is much more interested in the human response to war. The film is a series of vignettes illustrating this point as the journalists come across various set pieces throughout their journey to D.C. In Pennsylvania, a small group of men have taken command of a gas station and string up looters in the car wash; in West Virginia, an entire town is going about their business as though the war is not happening; and in what is undoubtedly the most tense sequence in the film, just outside of Charlottesville, VA, our group is held up by several nationalist soldiers digging a mass grave filled with those they deem un-American. Alex Garland creates an interesting take on the idea of an American civil war by examining it through the lens of a group of journalists. Rather than an extravaganza of CGI battles, this begs for a much more grounded and practical approach to the conflict, which is exactly what we get. It puts the disquieting notion of what a war-torn United States could look like front and center without gratuitous spectacle to cushion the blow. I couldn’t help but reflect on the way the 2023 Academy-Award-winning documentary _20 Days in Mariupol_ made me feel; I was deeply and profoundly disturbed by that film, but months later, I am able to mentally demarcate those events and images in Ukraine as being halfway across the globe. I am safe from them. _Civil War_ forced me to consider: what if they weren’t, and I wasn’t? With _Civil War_, Alex Garland has reached into an all-too-plausible future and pulled out a nauseatingly anxious portrait of an America that has fallen. The public discourse surrounding this movie is undoubtedly hurtling towards contentious debates, and with intentionally vague in-text politics, it’s relatively easy for almost anyone to claim that this film justifies their current political ideology and intolerances; one can readily adjust who is “us” and who is “them”. This dichotomy sounds divisive, but if the sides are so easily characterized as one or the other, doesn’t that actually mean that they’re much closer than you’d think? In investigating our differences, Garland has made a poignant argument — and perhaps a desperate plea — that Americans are, maybe, more alike than we are different.

This was a pretty good movie where they followed war photographers. They hinted at the reason for the civil war without getting super political about it, which I think was actually a good move.

Actually, what I liked the most was the Washington part. It's not bad, but it's not how it was sold to me.

Some of the shots in this movie like the forest fire were beautiful

There´s a lot of hint on which side is which, and i have an idea about it, but that's beside the point.great movie about human condition and journalism.

"I need a quote" "Na cara não pra não estragar o velório 😭"

não sei o que eu esperava mas foi bem melhor

Terrible movie